Ambient Science: Click the Volume and issue number for Complete Article

Location where to get the Complete Article --> Ambient Science: Vol 1, No 2 (2014): 36-46

ISSN- 2348-5191 (Print version); 2348-8980 (Online)

Assessment of Human-Wildlife Conflicts in Poba Reserved Forest, Dhemaji District, Assam (INDIA)



Rajeswar Pegu, Ajit K. Tamuli, Robindra Teron

Abstract

Human-wildlife conflicts from 1971-2013 in Poba Reserved Forest is presented here. Data collection included interview, records of forest department and participant observation. There is an increasing trend of human-wildlife conflict in Poba RF. Encroachment for agricultural expansion, frequent venturing into forests to collect minor forest products and livestock grazing are major causes of conflicts. Most cases of conflict occurred in forests and crop fields suggesting encroachment and venturing into animal habitat exposed human to conflict with wildlife. Pearson's correlation at 0.01 level of significance showed positive correlation between wildlife injured/killed and livestock killed/injured (0.819411) and wildlife injured/killed and property damaged (0.658009) but negative correlation between wildlife injured/killed and crop damaged (-0.04104). Crop raiding by wildlife caused considerable damage to crops and property resulting in food insecurity and economic loss to farmers; farmers also suffered economic loss due to livestock lifting by prey animals. Long years of exposure to crop and property loss and risk to life are associated with negative attitude towards wildlife. The present report will be useful in understanding the nature of conflicts and help local forest department in initiating appropriate conservation measures in Poba RF.


References

  • Arjunan M., Holmes C., Puyravaud J.P. & Davidar P. (2006):. Do developmental initiatives influence local attitudes toward conservation? A case study from the Kalakad–Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve, India. J. Environ. Manag., 79 (2): 188-197.
  • Borah J., Thakuria K., Baruah K.K., Sarma N.K. & Deka K (2005):. Man-Elephant Conflict Problem: A Case Study. Zoos' Print, 20(7):22-24.
  • Distefano E. (2005):.Human-Wildlife Conflict Worldwide: collection of case studies, analysis of management strategies and good practices . Published Report. FAO, Rome.
  • Erkinaro E., Kalevi H., Lindgren E. & Sulkava S. (1982):. Occurrence and spread of wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in the eastern Fenno Scandia. Memoranda, 58: 39-47.
  • Fadeev E.V. (1981):. Dynamics of the northern limits of the area of distribution of the wild boar, Sus scrofa in Eastern Europe. Biol. Nauk. (Mosc.), O(9): 56-64.
  • Hoare R. (2000):. African elephants and humans in conflict: the outlook for coexistence. Oryx, 34:34-38.
  • Karanth K.K., Gopalaswamy, A.M., Prasad, P.K. & Dasgupta, S. (2013):. Patterns of humanwildlife conflicts and compensation: Insights from Western Ghats protected areas. Biol. Conserv., 166:175-185.
  • Lamarque F., Anderson, J., Chardonnet, P., Fergusson, R., Lagrange, M., Osei-Owusu, Y., Bakker, L., Belemsobgo, U., Beytell, B., Boulet, H., Soto, B. & Tabi Tako-Eta, P. (2008): Human-Wildlife Conflict in Africa- An Overview of Causes, Consequences and Management Strategies. Working Paper of IFCW and FAO, Rome.
  • Linkie M., Dinata Y., Nofrianto A. & Leader-Williams N. (2007):. Patterns and Perceptions of wildlife crop raiding in and around Kerinci Seblat National Park. Sumatra Animal Conservation, 10:127-135.
  • Naughton-Treves L. (1998):. Predicting patterns of crop damage by wildlife around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Conserv. Biol., 12:156-168.
  • Naughton-Treves L. & Treves A. (2005): Socio-ecological factors shaping local support for wildlife: Crop-raiding by elephants and other wildlife in Africa. In: People and wildlife: Conflict or coexistence? R. Woodroffe, S. Thirgood & A. Rabinowitzeds., 252-277. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Patel D. & Dharaiya N. (2014): Human-wildlife conflicts in arid areas of Western India: strategies for mutual co-existence. Ambient Science, 1(1):29-37.
  • Pegu R., Gogoi J., Tamuli A.K. and Teron R. (2013):. Ethnobotanical study of wild edible plants in Poba Reserved Forest, Assam (India): multiple functions and implications for conservation. Research Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, 1(3):1-10.
  • Riley S.J. & Decker D.J. (2000): Wildlife stakeholder acceptance capacity for cougars in Montana. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 28:931-939.
  • Sillero-Zubri C. & Switzer D. (2001): Crop raiding primates: searching for alternative human ways to resolve conflict with farmers in Africa. Publisher: People and Wildlife Initiative Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Oxford University.
  • Sukumar R. (1994): Wildlife-human conflicts in India: an ecological and social perspective. In: Social Ecology, Guha, R. ed., pp.303-317, Oxford University, New Delhi.
  • Tisdell C.A. (1982): Wild pigs: Environmental Pest or Economic Resource, pp. 445, Pergamon Press: Sydney.
  • Treves A., Wallace R.B. & White S. (2009):. Participatory planning of interventions to mitigate humanwildlife conflicts. Conserv. Biol. 23: 1577-1587.
  • Woodroffe R., Thirgood S. & Rabinowitz A. (2005):. People and Wildlife, Conflict or Coexistence? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. World Park Congress.
  • WPC (World Park Congress) recommendation 20. (2003): Preventing & mitigating human-wildlife conflicts. Publisher: IUCN, Rue Mauverney 28, Switzerland.

    • DOI:10.21276/ambi.2014.01.2.ra01

    Creative Commons License

    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
    Published by: National Cave Research and Protection Organization, India

    <Environmental Science+Zoology+Geology+Cave Science>AMBIENT SCIENCE