Ambient Science: Click the Volume and issue number for Complete Article

Location where to get the Complete Article --> Vol 2, No 1 (2015): 16-24

ISSN- 2348-5191 (Print version); 2348-8980 (Online)

Challenges and Remedies to Biodiversity in Singhason Landscape



Ni-et Teronpi, A.K. Tamuli, Robindra Teron

Abstract

The Singhason hill range in Assam is a cultural landscape with rich biodiversity and implications for conservation of biodiversity. In recent years, the hill range has been under pressure particularly from human interference that poses considerable threats to biodiversity and the landscape. There is no previous study on environment of Singhason hills due to which biodiversity status, agricultural practices and other related aspects of the hill are unknown. In the present paper, drivers of environmental deterioration in Singhason landscape and opportunities for its conservation are discussed. Data collection included interview and participant observations; informant responses on drivers of environmental deterioration have been presented as Relative Frequency. Over-harvesting is the most potent driver with RF score of 91.7% followed by mining of lime stone and coal (83.3%), monoculture with rubber and teak (35.4%) and shifting cultivation (12.5%). Overexploitation is the major cause of degradation of agar-wood, cinnamon, black dammar, rattans and bamboo resources. Agroforestry with local plants such as black dammar, cinnamon, broom grass, orange, pineapple and pear hold promises for food production, food security, nutrition, health and socio-cultural benefits.


References

  • Brady N.C. (1996): Alternatives to slash-and-burn: a global imperative. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 58 (1); 3-11.
  • Broad S. (1995): Agarwood harvesting in Vietnam. TRAFFIC Bulletin, 15:96.
  • Champion H.G. & Seth S.K. (2005): Revised forest types of India. Government of India. Published by: Books from India or Oscar Publications, New Delhi. pp. 404
  • DeJong W. (1997): Developing swidden agriculture and the threat of biodiversity loss. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 62 (23); 187-197.
  • Goodman LA. (1961): Snowball sampling. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32 (1); 148-170.
  • Jeus M., Henriques P., Laranjeira P., Narciso V. & Leonor da Silva Carvalho M. (2012): The impact of shifting cultivation in the forestry ecosystems of Timor-Leste. CEFAGE-UE Working Paper, Portugal. pp.16.
  • Ramakrishnan P.S. (1992): Tropical forests, Exploitation and Management. Impact of Science on Society, 42; 149-162.
  • Sastry N. (2002): Forest Fires, Air Pollution and Mortality in Southeast Asia. Demography, 39 (1); 123.
  • Sata W., Veravatnanond V., Bowjai P. & Rithdet P. (2008): Environment Changes of Lampao Dam Communities in Northeast Thailand. J. Soc. Sci., 4 (4); 334-337.
  • Sharma D.K. & Mishra J.K. (2011): Impact of Environmental Changes on Biodiversity. Indian J.Sci.Res. 2 (4); 137-139.
  • Tinker P.B., Ingram J.S.I. & Struwe S. (1996): Effects of slash-and-burn agriculture and deforestation on climate change. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 58 (1); 13-22.
  • Veravatnanond V. (1998): Environment and Development. 4th Edn, Asian Institute for Public Health, Nakorn Pathom, p. 21-23.

  • DOI:10.21276/ambi.2015.02.1.ra03


    Creative Commons License


    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
    Published by: National Cave Research and Protection Organization, India

    <Environmental Science+Zoology+Geology+Cave Science>AMBIENT SCIENCE